BGR Group Names Maya Seiden Co-Chair of International and Trade Practice

Washington, D.C. (October 26, 2021) – BGR Group, Washington, D.C.’s premier bipartisan lobbying and public relations firm, has named Principal Maya Seiden Co-Chair of the firm’s International and Trade Practice. In her role, she advocates in the U.S. on behalf of foreign countries and individuals and advises companies on navigating challenges in the U.S. and overseas.

“Since joining BGR, Maya has been an incredible colleague and tremendous asset to clients across the firm,” BGR Group Chairman and CEO Bob Wood said. “Her breadth of experience in government and the private sector makes her a unique and exceptional advisor on a myriad of issues. We are proud to name her Co-Chair of our International and Trade Practice.”

“Maya brings an insider’s experience and analytical perspective to every client and every situation,” BGR President Erskine Wells said. “She is smart, hardworking, and savvy. BGR is privileged to have her on our leadership team.”

A veteran of the Clinton and Obama administrations, Maya served in senior positions at the State Department, Energy Department and the White House. Outside of government, Maya held senior strategy, operations and communications positions in the corporate and non-profit sectors.

Prior to joining BGR in 2014, Maya served as Chief of Staff to the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, overseeing budget and strategic planning for the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). She led Secretary Clinton’s effort to elevate the State Department’s influence in economics and business promotion. During the Clinton administration, Maya was Special Assistant to Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson and Special Assistant in Cabinet Affairs at the White House.

In the private sector, Maya served as Vice President of Strategy and Business Development at BlackRock, where she advised the firm’s Executive Committee and Chief Operating Officer on management, communications and operations; worked on major mergers and acquisitions; and developed the company’s first government relations and public policy strategy.

From 2003 to 2007, Maya managed operations at New York University, overseeing the streamlining of operations and management, including the integration of long-term strategic planning and budgeting across the University and the expansion of the University to include international campuses. Previously, Maya advised companies on managing emerging issues and crises at Edelman Public Relations.

Maya received her bachelor’s degree from Wesleyan University and her master’s degree in business administration from New York University.

Ukraine: Time for a True Strategic Partnership

By Ambassador Kurt Volker

The U.S. and Ukraine, and the West more broadly, need to get serious about putting the cards on the table that would deter Putin from any further military action.

Coming on the heels of Russia’s massive military build-up in and around Ukraine in April 2021, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s visit to Kyiv this week is a strong show of support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is also an opportunity to finally realize a genuine strategic partnership between the two countries.

Even in the best of times, Ukraine has often viewed the West as insufficiently supportive of Ukraine’s security and membership in Euro-Atlantic institutions, while the West has viewed Ukraine as insufficiently clear and committed to strengthening the rule of law and rooting out corruption.

The dynamic has not always been healthy. What Ukraine sees as legitimate aspirations (like NATO membership), the West has sometimes seen as unrealistic and pushy. And what the West sees as “tough love” in helping Ukraine on reforms and governance, the Ukrainians sometimes see as unrealistic and at times even unsympathetic interference in Ukrainian politics, which are complicated beyond belief.

READ FULL ARTICLE

BGR Views: Meet Fred Turner

In the latest BGR Views, BGR PR Principal Jo Maney introduces BGR’s latest hire, Fred Turner, chief of staff to Sen. Bob Menendez, who will be joining BGR’s International Practice as a Senior Vice President.

BGR Views: Meet Fred Turner from BGR Group on Vimeo.

VIDEO: Meet Amb. Douglas Lute, BGR’s new Chair of International, Defense Practices

In the latest BGR Views, BGR PR Vice President Jo Maney asks Douglas Lute, Chair of BGR Group’s International and Defense Practices, what he will bring to BGR clients.

BGR’s Kurt Volker Tops 2020 Russian Foreign Policy Must-Reads

THE YEAR IN REVIEW

In 2020, Putin Raised the Stakes at Home and Abroad

Russia started the year with political uncertainty, then cemented Putin’s future, and ended the year by poisoning the main opposition figure—and future relations with the Biden administration.

BY AMY MACKINNON

Russia began 2020 in a haze of uncertainty, as President Vladimir Putin faced constitutionally imposed term limits that could have curtailed the longest Kremlin reign since Joseph Stalin. In January, after the prime minister and cabinet resigned en masse, Putin named a little-known tax inspector as prime minister—neatly pruning any political threat. By July, a referendum secured Putin the right to another two terms as president once his current time is up in 2024.

But not all is sewn up on the home front, as months of protests in the far-eastern city of Khabarovsk show. Putin and his minions dealt with the biggest opposition threat frontally, poisoning presidential contender Alexei Navalny with a new variant of the nerve agent Novichok. And the skullduggery went abroad: Russian mercenaries fought in Libya, Russia was accused of paying bounties to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan, and this month it was revealed that the U.S. government was thoroughly hacked and ransacked, allegedly by Russian cyberspies.

U.S. President-elect Joe Biden will have plenty to worry about come January, whether the raging pandemic and a weak economy or a deeply polarized electorate. But, like the last three—or seven, or nine—presidents before him, he’ll have Russia on his mind, too. But please, experts say, no more resets.

Here are five of Foreign Policy’s top Russia stories this year.

4. No More Resets With Russia
by Kurt Volker, Aug. 11

Biden will be the fourth U.S. president to hold office during Putin’s rule. Each of his predecessors sought to chart their own course in relations with Moscow. George W. Bush looked into Putin’s eyes and got a “sense of his soul.” Barack Obama started with a reset and ended with a finger in Putin’s chest over election interference. Then there were four years of President Donald Trump’s curious—and still unexplained—affinity for the Russian leader.

No more, argues Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special representative for Ukraine peace negotiations. “Instead of a reset, the West needs the patience to apply consistent and steady pressure against Russian aggression, and to support those in Russia and in neighboring states who seek freedom, democracy, and security. For once, it is time for Russia, not the West, to rethink its policy,” Volker wrote.

READ MORE

LISTEN: BGR expert on the changes in South Korea’s conglomerates

On this Ambassador’s Brief podcast, BGR PR Principal and Korea expert Frank Ahrens talks with Kings College London’s Dr. Ramon Pacheco Pardo on the remarkable change underway in South Korea’s conglomerates.

LISTEN HERE

 

International Outlook from Both Sides of BGR

BGR’s bipartisan lobbying expertise is highlighted by Mark Tavlarides, a former Democratic congressional aide, and Lester Munson, a former Republican staffer, who discuss the international policy outlook in a Biden or Trump administration.

 

Coronavirus: What Comes Next?

[vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1592319691550{padding-top: 1em !important;padding-bottom: 1em !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

REAL CLEAR POLITICS

April 27, 2020

To gain insights on longer-term issues tied to the coronavirus pandemic, RCW Editor-at-Large and BGR Senior International Advisor Kurt Volker spoke with former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt. A full transcript follows:

Kurt Volker:  So Carl:  You have been Prime Minister, you have been Foreign Minister, you’re a senior European statesman, and I just thought it would be interesting for people on this side of the Atlantic to get a perspective on what you’re seeing.   

What is it like in Sweden now?  It has been in the news a lot.  Some people here are saying, Oh, Sweden is doing this herd immunity thing, and that’s the right thing, because it has kept the economy going.  Others have said, “No, no, no they’re going to get higher deaths now. and it’s going to be worse.  How do you see it living there, and stepping out from there, how do you see Sweden comparing with the rest of Europe?

Read more

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Trump hobbles foreign aid as coronavirus rips around the world

Politico

April 15, 2020
By NAHAL TOOSI

Earlier this week, a group of officials with USAID, an agency on the front lines of the rapidly escalating global battle against the coronavirus, found themselves in an increasingly bizarre conversation with some of their colleagues inside the Trump administration.

The officials wanted to know if they could tell America’s longtime global health partners, like the World Health Organization, the international Red Cross and UNICEF, that they were allowed to use U.S. funds to buy coronavirus test kits and certain chemicals. But they couldn’t get a clear answer to their question.

Instead, their colleagues kept responding with cryptic emails saying that those items were on a list that they did not disclose. But they wouldn’t say whether that mysterious list consisted of items that could be purchased or could not be purchased. When pressed for clarity by the flustered USAID officials, the colleagues said they were awaiting guidance on their purchasing questions from higher authorities, presumably the White House.

According to interviews with more than half a dozen current and former USAID officials as well as other people familiar with the agency, the baffling exchange is indicative of how many USAID staffers say they feel frozen as the virus rips through poor countries such as Pakistan and Ecuador. Instead of clear guidance from the Trump administration’s upper echelons, they are getting mixed signals on whether to push or hold back, wasting critical time that could be used to fight the outbreak.

“By the time we get money at the door, we may not able to do anything effective for the coronavirus,” one USAID official said. “This is the dumbest way to try and beat a pandemic.”

The confusion could hardly come at a worse time for USAID. The aid agency, which manages about $20 billion in foreign aid each year, has just begun a leadership transition, with the recent departure of its well-regarded administrator Mark Green and his replacement by an acting chief. USAID also has fended off attempts to slash its budget by a president deeply skeptical of the value of foreign aid. And a White House review of what material USAID gives other countries has compounded the overall uncertainty at the agency.

The tumult comes as the agency gears up to play a critical role in the global fight against Covid-19. The virus is now spreading in developing countries ill-equipped to combat the outbreak on their own but where USAID officials have deep relationships and technical expertise. Agency officials say their effort to stop the virus in those countries is not simply about altruism: Eradicating Covid-19 in places like Africa and Latin America could help prevent the virus from reemerging in the United States and setting off a second wave of deaths and economic collapse.

“USAID has got a presence in scores of countries likely to be hardest hit because their own capabilities are modest,” said Lester Munson, co-chair of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network and a former USAID official. “It’s going to need resources, some judgment, top cover from the State Department and the White House to do the things it needs to do.”

Read more

Ukraine’s Moment of Truth

CEPA

April 8, 2020
BY AMBASSADOR KURT VOLKER

Ukraine’s Parliament will face a moment of truth when it meets on April 10. As the novel coronavirus increasingly impacts the country, the Rada must finally pass the banking legislation necessary to free up $8 billion in IMF funding, and a further $1.5 billion from other sources.

It is easy to forget that 2019 was a year of euphoria in Ukraine. Building on solid reforms implemented since the 2014 Revolution of Dignity, in 2019 Ukraine dramatically improved its finances and borrowing costs, advanced stalled reforms, repositioned itself in the eyes of foreign investors, and laid the foundations for rapid growth. Ukraine was outpacing global markets for the first time since achieving independence in 1991. With a GDP per capita among the lowest in Europe — but also with a talented workforce and vast natural resources — Ukraine has the greatest upward economic potential on the continent. The election of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who promised far-reaching reform and a renewed push for peace, buoyed both international markets and the national mood.

By contrast, 2020 has become a year of dire challenge. The coronavirus has hit Ukraine. As in the United States, a shortage of testing kits means the virus is probably more widespread than official numbers can confirm. Available healthcare services may become over-stretched. Government financial resources will be insufficient.

Read more