What Does K-pop Have to Do With U.S. Politics? Plenty

Real Clear Politics

June 26, 2020
BY FRANK AHRENS

Maybe the first time you heard of K-pop fans, or maybe even K-pop music, was in the wake of President Trump’s campaign rally last weekend in Tulsa, Okla. But it will not be the last.

TikTokkers came up with the idea of ordering thousands of tickets to Trump’s rally with no intention of showing up, in hopes of making the arena embarrassingly empty. Whether the TikTokkers or COVID-19 was the reason for low turnout is up for debate. What is clear, however, is that K-pop fans took the TikTokkers’ idea and signal-boosted it across social media with lightning speed and algorithm-savvy tactics. It was only the most recent of a number of social media disruptions caused by K-pop fans, which I believe will increase, especially as the presidential election draws closer.

Loosely, K-pop is the term given to pop music created by artists from South Korea, typically by what are erroneously referred to as boy bands and girl bands. (These are grown men and women.) The songs’ lyrics are mostly in Korean with some English words. But that has proven no inhibitor to the genre’s worldwide growth. The beats and grooves are universally appealing, the artists’ choreography is spellbinding, and the artists themselves, by and large, tend to project an agreeable, even wholesome persona and are increasingly associated with charitable causes. Like any musical genre, the songs cover the range of emotions, but much of the music is positive and affirming. This is music you can dance to AND feel good about supporting, as opposed to wallowing in whiny emo rock or bloodying your head with nihilistic metal.

But you don’t really need to know about K-pop music. It’s the K-pop fans you need to worry about. If you’re involved in politics, government, advocacy or communications and you don’t know about K-pop fans, then you’re engaging in professional malpractice.

Read More

Building the Post-Pandemic World

The National Interest

May 24, 2020
BY JAMES JAY CARAFANO and KURT VOLKER

The coronavirus pandemic has set the stage for the greatest upheaval in the global order since World War Two. China, Russia, Iran and other adversaries of America are positioning themselves to take advantage of the post-pandemic environment and may have significant advantages in doing so.

The United States cannot afford to ignore this reality and concentrate solely on spurring a domestic recovery. Washington must lead an international effort of like-minded democracies—including Allies and friends in Europe, Asia, South Asia and the Middle East—to shape the world emerging from coronavirus in a way that favors freedom, prosperity, and global security.

The “West”— the idea, not the place—remains the most visionary, powerful, resourceful, inspiring, and sustainable hope for humanity. Our leaders must marshal these strengths now to build a post-pandemic world that will benefit future generations.

Much of the world remains focused on repairing the local damage done by the coronavirus and taking international steps to improve preparedness for future pandemics. These are important and necessary efforts. But it is not too soon to begin thinking through the geopolitical impact of the virus and designing strategies for advancing western values and interests.

This is not the first time the West has faced a brave new world and needed to put together a vision and strategy for the future.

Read More

Republican Governors Paved the Road to Recovery Before the Coronavirus Crisis Began

Newsweek

“By enacting sound fiscal management, pro-growth policies and common-sense conservative reforms in good times, Republican governors have put their states and citizens on a speedier pathway to renewed prosperity.”

May 12, 2020
BY GOVERNORS SCOTT WALKER, HALEY BARBOUR and SUSANA MARTINEZ

“No American living today has experienced a crisis quite like the threat posed by the coronavirus. This pandemic’s economic, public health and societal implications are unique in our history.

It is unsurprising to us that America’s governors immediately stepped up and tackled this challenge head-on. As governors continue their efforts to flatten the curve and chart a pathway back to the historic economic prosperity we were experiencing just a few short weeks ago, states with Republican governors who have implemented common-sense fiscal policies are best positioned for a swift and successful rebound.

Just as any individual or family is better able to cope with the financial impact of a sudden illness, job loss or property damage when they have spent responsibly and saved what they could, states that take these steps when times are good are far better positioned to stay solvent when a crisis hits.

This is not a partisan statement—this crisis is bigger than politics. It is simply what the data show us.

Looking back on the Great Recession of the last decade, states with low debt, solid credit ratings, sound budgeting practices and lower tax rates bounced back the fastest. States with high taxes, high spending levels, and large unfunded pension liabilities took the longest to recover.

The strong economic policies favored by Republican governors fall into the former category.

States that diligently squirreled away savings instead of yielding to the temptation to spend every penny have a massive advantage in addressing looming revenue shortfalls. Eighteen of the top 25 states with the healthiest rainy day funds have Republican governors, including 12 of the 18 states with funds equaling more than 10 percent of their total budget in the bank.

Read more

Coronavirus: What Comes Next?

[vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1592319691550{padding-top: 1em !important;padding-bottom: 1em !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

REAL CLEAR POLITICS

April 27, 2020

To gain insights on longer-term issues tied to the coronavirus pandemic, RCW Editor-at-Large and BGR Senior International Advisor Kurt Volker spoke with former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt. A full transcript follows:

Kurt Volker:  So Carl:  You have been Prime Minister, you have been Foreign Minister, you’re a senior European statesman, and I just thought it would be interesting for people on this side of the Atlantic to get a perspective on what you’re seeing.   

What is it like in Sweden now?  It has been in the news a lot.  Some people here are saying, Oh, Sweden is doing this herd immunity thing, and that’s the right thing, because it has kept the economy going.  Others have said, “No, no, no they’re going to get higher deaths now. and it’s going to be worse.  How do you see it living there, and stepping out from there, how do you see Sweden comparing with the rest of Europe?

Read more

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Trump hobbles foreign aid as coronavirus rips around the world

Politico

April 15, 2020
By NAHAL TOOSI

Earlier this week, a group of officials with USAID, an agency on the front lines of the rapidly escalating global battle against the coronavirus, found themselves in an increasingly bizarre conversation with some of their colleagues inside the Trump administration.

The officials wanted to know if they could tell America’s longtime global health partners, like the World Health Organization, the international Red Cross and UNICEF, that they were allowed to use U.S. funds to buy coronavirus test kits and certain chemicals. But they couldn’t get a clear answer to their question.

Instead, their colleagues kept responding with cryptic emails saying that those items were on a list that they did not disclose. But they wouldn’t say whether that mysterious list consisted of items that could be purchased or could not be purchased. When pressed for clarity by the flustered USAID officials, the colleagues said they were awaiting guidance on their purchasing questions from higher authorities, presumably the White House.

According to interviews with more than half a dozen current and former USAID officials as well as other people familiar with the agency, the baffling exchange is indicative of how many USAID staffers say they feel frozen as the virus rips through poor countries such as Pakistan and Ecuador. Instead of clear guidance from the Trump administration’s upper echelons, they are getting mixed signals on whether to push or hold back, wasting critical time that could be used to fight the outbreak.

“By the time we get money at the door, we may not able to do anything effective for the coronavirus,” one USAID official said. “This is the dumbest way to try and beat a pandemic.”

The confusion could hardly come at a worse time for USAID. The aid agency, which manages about $20 billion in foreign aid each year, has just begun a leadership transition, with the recent departure of its well-regarded administrator Mark Green and his replacement by an acting chief. USAID also has fended off attempts to slash its budget by a president deeply skeptical of the value of foreign aid. And a White House review of what material USAID gives other countries has compounded the overall uncertainty at the agency.

The tumult comes as the agency gears up to play a critical role in the global fight against Covid-19. The virus is now spreading in developing countries ill-equipped to combat the outbreak on their own but where USAID officials have deep relationships and technical expertise. Agency officials say their effort to stop the virus in those countries is not simply about altruism: Eradicating Covid-19 in places like Africa and Latin America could help prevent the virus from reemerging in the United States and setting off a second wave of deaths and economic collapse.

“USAID has got a presence in scores of countries likely to be hardest hit because their own capabilities are modest,” said Lester Munson, co-chair of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network and a former USAID official. “It’s going to need resources, some judgment, top cover from the State Department and the White House to do the things it needs to do.”

Read more

Ukraine’s Moment of Truth

CEPA

April 8, 2020
BY AMBASSADOR KURT VOLKER

Ukraine’s Parliament will face a moment of truth when it meets on April 10. As the novel coronavirus increasingly impacts the country, the Rada must finally pass the banking legislation necessary to free up $8 billion in IMF funding, and a further $1.5 billion from other sources.

It is easy to forget that 2019 was a year of euphoria in Ukraine. Building on solid reforms implemented since the 2014 Revolution of Dignity, in 2019 Ukraine dramatically improved its finances and borrowing costs, advanced stalled reforms, repositioned itself in the eyes of foreign investors, and laid the foundations for rapid growth. Ukraine was outpacing global markets for the first time since achieving independence in 1991. With a GDP per capita among the lowest in Europe — but also with a talented workforce and vast natural resources — Ukraine has the greatest upward economic potential on the continent. The election of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who promised far-reaching reform and a renewed push for peace, buoyed both international markets and the national mood.

By contrast, 2020 has become a year of dire challenge. The coronavirus has hit Ukraine. As in the United States, a shortage of testing kits means the virus is probably more widespread than official numbers can confirm. Available healthcare services may become over-stretched. Government financial resources will be insufficient.

Read more

State & Local Impact of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES)

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), H.R. 748

April 3, 2020
Brief Summary of Top-Line Items

  • Largest relief legislation ever passed by Congress
  • Represents one-half of all federal spending on an annual basis
  • Includes $150 billion in direct aid to states, territories, tribes, and local governments
  • Individual checks of $1200 sent directly to many Americans and $500 for children
  • Loan program for small businesses of $377 billion
  • $500 billion lending fund for businesses, cities and states

Download PDF

Lessons From Katrina and Other Mega-Disasters

Real Clear Politics

BY GOVERNOR HALEY BARBOUR

As our country confronts the coronavirus pandemic, there are lessons we can and should learn from previous mega-disasters. Although Hurricane Katrina was far different from the COVID-19 pandemic in so many ways, the worst natural disaster in American history, which struck the Gulf Coast nearly 15 years ago, has powerful lessons for us today.

First, no government, however big and powerful, can solve every problem that may strike every household or business all the time. Frankly, we shouldn’t want a government that powerful or expensive, or it would take away our freedoms.

As happened during Katrina, however, government has ramped up to respond to an unprecedented catastrophe. And, as with Katrina, there is criticism of governments’ decisions and efforts. I recall vividly that during Katrina I was attacked for not being critical of the federal response. And, yes, FEMA’s execution of its logistical plan failed. But every governmental entity involved in responding to the storm made mistakes, including the state of Mississippi, which I led at the time.

In any mega-disaster there is a fog-of-war component to the response. You are making it up as you go along. Decisions must be made, but some won’t produce the best outcomes. When that happens, you admit the decision needs to be changed and change it. Then move forward.

Read more

In Coronavirus Crisis, South Korea Shows How Government PR is Done

PR News

March 16, 2020

BY FRANK AHRENS

At its core PR is about relating information to the public. Few governments are doing that better than South Korea as it battles coronavirus.

South Korea wouldn’t think of its transparency and rapid communication of information as public relations. But PR pros recognize South Korea’s use of openness and transparency. They would admire its tactics, speed and technology.

Outside of China and Italy, coronavirus has hit no country harder than South Korea. More than 82,00 cases are reported (as of March 16, 2020). Fortunately, new cases have been trending down in recent days.

Communications Helping

The nation’s success against the virus is attributable in part to the varied, transparent and innovative ways the government has been communicating. Importantly, the communication is aimed at citizens and foreigners living in the country. Some highlights:

The Korean Centers for Disease Control conducts twice-daily briefings in English. In addition, it is offering daily updates in English. Seoul-based international media has lauded these briefings.

Every campaign needs a slogan. The country’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs created one based on the acronym TRUST. Some of the language is clunky (as in any document a committee creates), but it effectively outlines five pillars of the government’s response.

Testing and Convenience

Testing also has played a major role. The nation of 51 million has conducted more than 222,000 tests, far more than any other country – including China – per capita. South Korea has made testing free for anyone who wants a test and has made it convenient.

Read more

HottyToddy.com – “UM Winter Session Students Get Close-Up Look at Government in D.C.”

hottytoddy.com

February 8, 2020
BY EDWIN B. SMITH

While many of their peers slept in or otherwise relaxed during the winter break, eight University of Mississippi students eagerly tackled the topics of campaigns, elections and advocacy in the United States, thanks to a partnership between Study USA and the Haley Barbour Center for the Study of American Politics.

These Ole Miss students spent early January in the classroom to begin the intersession, examining how political science can inform the real-world campaign environment. To strengthen the connection with practical applications, the course culminated with a trip to Washington, D.C., where students met several professionals, including elected officials, lobbyists, campaign managers, staffers, fundraisers and more.

“The class exposes students to a far greater array of decision-makers and policymakers than students typically meet in Oxford,” said Marvin King, associate professor of political science and African American studies and senior fellow in the university’s Residential College South. “Leveraging the network effects of Gov. Haley Barbour presents our students a far richer and deeper perspective of Washington, D.C., politics and policy.”

Among leaders meeting with the group were U.S. Sens. Roger Wicker, Cindy Hyde-Smith and Mitch McConnell and U.S. Rep. Michael Guest.

“This year, we had another great group of students and we had a program packed with outstanding speakers,” Barbour said.

“The students went to the White House and heard from White House staff; went to the Capitol and heard from senators, congressmen and Hill staff; and had two full days of classes about campaigns and elections, taught by some of the top political professionals in Washington. The students immersed themselves in it from the start.”

BGR, Barbour’s lobbying firm, was instrumental in making the trip happen, organizing meetings and providing access to D.C. decision-makers and other movers and shakers.

Read more